cabar.asia
Photoreport: Splendour and Misery of the Kazakh "Black Diamonds"
by Oleg Bitner
Karaganda is one of the largest coal-mining regions in Kazakhstan. There are about 32 thousand miners in the region. For many years, the region is one of three regions with the biggest number of workplace injuries, as reported by the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Population.
Note:
Recourse payments are payments by employer to miners under a recourse claim. They are calculated as a percentage of an average income. The employer compensates the damage caused to his employee, who developed health condition as a result of injuries or occupational diseases (usually – silicosis, hand-arm vibration syndrome, osteochondrosis).

The miners, receivers of the recourse payments, may continue to work in the mine, but due to the health condition, they can work either in support facilities or on the surface. Occasionally, in order to save money, they are forced to either quit the job, or transfer to a low-paying job.
Coal: Past and Present
In Karaganda area, the coal began to be mined in the middle of the 19th century. The coal was mainly required for the production of copper. Coal mining in the open steppe was not easy; the mines were preserved and reopened again.

The industrialisation of Kazakhstan in the 1930s gave a new impetus to coal mining. The Karaganda coal basin was declared an all-Union construction site. Miners (mostly, repressed citizens of the USSR) arrived from all parts of the country. For them, the cottages were built of clay not far from the mine. In 1934, the mining villages of Maikuduk, Tikhonovka and Prishakhtinsky were united, and received the status of a city – Karaganda.
Before the collapse of the USSR, working in the mine was considered prestigious. Decent salaries and numerous benefits, including early retirement, attracted people from all educational backgrounds to the industry. Numerous colleges trained specialists, and highly qualified professional workers, engineers, and technicians graduated from the polytechnic institute.
The collapse of the economy in 90s led to the drop in demand for coal. The mine workers did not receive their salaries for months; in 1996, the government sold the best mines to the foreign company – currently named JSC "Arcelor Mittal Temirtau" (AMT). The new owner took the responsibility to pay back the debts, regularly pay salaries to mine workers and people with disabilities under recourse claims.

According to the Bureau of National Statistics, in 2019, the number of mine workers in Karaganda region amounted to 32,750, while the number of people receiving recourse payments was about 10,000.

For many years, Karaganda region is one of three regions with the biggest number of workplace injuries, as reported by the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Population.
Exhausted Human Resources
"Production Plant of Poor People With Disabilities"
"Before 1998, the recalculation was linked to the salary growth, but after 1999, after the adoption of the special part of the Civil Code, the "Arcelor" stopped making such recalculation. The recourse payments were pennyworth, they were indexed to the calculation indicator and did not increase. If the salary was within a range of 200,000-300,000 tenge ($479-704) at that time, my 60% of the salary amounted to 30,000 tenge ($70.46). Not agreeing to such terms, we, recourse payment receivers, united and started advocating for the amendment of the legislation, suing AMT."
Ivan Shtrek, a former miner
CABAR.asia officially addressed the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Population of Kazakhstan to find out if the issue of lowering the retirement age for miners is being considered.

The Ministry responded and explained the procedure for receiving the accumulative pension by miners, consisting of a solidary, state pension, and payments from the Unified Accumulative Pension Fund (this information is known to every Kazakhstan resident) and summarized:
"Thus, reducing the retirement age to 50 for employees of the mining and metallurgical complex, who are also provided with pension contributions from the employer, will lead to insufficient pension savings upon retirement."
To the question about the possibility of returning the paragraph 6 of Article 938 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on recalculating compensation for harm to health based on an increase in average wages (the miners with disabilities seek to return this paragraph since 2015), we received an extensive answer describing the procedure for increasing benefits in proportion to the average value of the projected level of inflation. The final statement of the answer:
"Taking into account the above, we consider it inexpedient to return paragraph 6 of Article 938 of the Civil Code."
That is, on the key problem which miners with disabilities discuss in working groups, the decision is already made and it is not in favor of people with disabilities.

We received the following response to the address to "Arcelor Mittal":
"The forecast of the socio-economic development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020-2024 in terms of indexation to persons receiving compensation for harm to health has been fulfilled."
Local authorities, namely the Department for Labour Inspection of Karaganda region, conduct the meetings of working groups, where the demands and problems of former miners are discussed. These meeting do not solve systemic problems of people with disabilities, but they at least help them to meet the representatives of the former employer and ask them questions in presence of the prosecutors and other officials.
CABAR.asia journalist had an opportunity to join one of such meetings online. After hearing about it, the representative of "Arcelor Mittal" Vera Tereshkina warned the meeting participants that she would not present any figures while the journalist is present. What are these mystical figures, and why they can be presented to the meeting participants – but not to journalists, remained unclear.

In general, the impression of the meeting does not give ground for an optimism. It is clear that the issue of fair recourse payments will not be resolved on the level of parliament, and that the employers are not likely to make any steps towards the people with disabilities.
© 2021 CABAR.asia